Article “Paha Kaksonen” in Finnish Wikipedia has 10 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 3 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article “Paha Kaksonen”, its content was written by 8 registered users of Finnish Wikipedia and edited by 8 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 1 times in Finnish Wikipedia and cited 1 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Finnish: #67179 04.2016 |
Global: #2933191 01.2008 |
| Best Rank | Finnish: #6371 06.2007 |
Global: #431072 06.2007 |
On 28 January 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League, Nipah virus, Doomsday Clock, UEFA Champions League, Elena Rybakina, Donald Trump, 2026 European Men's Handball Championship, killing of Alex Pretti, Kristi Noem, deaths in 2026.
In Finnish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Liisa Akimof, Tytti Tuppurainen, Matti Nykänen, Simo Silmu, Kaarina Maununtytär, Vatsa sisään, rinta ulos!, Pia Hiltunen, Etta (artisti), Arto Melleri, Pertti Rauhio.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(11.58+2.44+0+14.29+21.62)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
